Heritage - Dresser Mirror
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
#38707
Dresser Mirror - Beveled Waterfall Tri-View - 52W x 47.5H
52W x 47.5H
| $750 | $825 | $900 | $1,050 | $1,275 |
  | |||||
Also Available | |||||
|
|
|
|
| |
|
#38708
Dresser Mirror - Beveled - 28.75W x 40.5H
28.75W x 1.625D x 40.5H
| $595 | $655 | $715 | $835 | $1,010 |
  | |||||
|
#38726
Dresser Mirror - Beveled - 42.5W x 35.75H
42.5W x 35.75H
| $615 | $680 | $740 | $860 | $1,045 |
 | |||||
|
#38725
Dresser Mirror - Beveled - 58.25W x 35.75H
58.25W x 35.75H
| $685 | $755 | $825 | $960 | $1,165 |
 | |||||
|
#38710
Dresser Mirror - Beveled Square Crown Top - 46W x 43.5H
46W x 43.5H
| $645 | $710 | $775 | $900 | $1,095 |
 | |||||
|
#38709
Dresser Mirror - Shorter Tri-View - 52W x 40.5H
52W x 40.5H
| $720 | $790 | $865 | $1,010 | $1,225 |
 | |||||
|
#38719
Dresser Mirror - Solid Crown Chest - 46W x 28.5H
46W x 28.5H
| $585 | $645 | $705 | $820 | $995 |
 | |||||
View Wood & Stain Samples
Ordering Process
Ready to order? We will go over everything with you before you place your order.
- Select the Wood Species
- Choose a Finish - See samples here
- Review any other options listed below
- Or Contact us
- 614-846-1234
- Visit our store
All of our products are handmade from scratch to your specifications.
Made to order just for you, our craftsmen usually require 8 to 12 weeks to complete most items.
The estimated lead time varies from piece to piece. Please let us know if you have any specific time constraints.
We work to deliver furniture as soon as possible while maintaining our high standard of quality.
Options
The price for certain options may be based on the number of units an item has
| General Options | available for | |
| Jewelry Slideout Behind Mirror | Each, add: $350 | All |
Our goal is to bring you the most information in an easy to use format.
Let us know if you have specific space requirements as some of the measurements are approximate.
While we make every effort to ensure our website is accurate, sometimes there is information listed here that is incorrect.
